Excavations at the LoDaisKa Site in the Denver, Colorado area — Background and Themes
Edition facts
Before opening Excavations at the LoDaisKa Site in the Denver, Colorado area — Background and Themes, the edition data offers a quick orientation: 35,563 words, 2 hr 35 min estimated reading time, and 26 detected text sections.
The text analysis averages about 14.2 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.
Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Pawnee Indians,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.
Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.
How this score is calculated
- Description quality20 pts
- Title & short description10 pts
- Source metadata20 pts
- Text length15 pts
- Chapters / structure15 pts
- EPUB file integrity20 pts
Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.
Read the Text
y inches above the ground surface at this spot. A second stake was located on a north-south line from the first (using magnetic north) at the opposite end of the shelter. A horizontal line connecting these stakes at the level of the datum point was considered the baseline. The area of the rock shelter to be excavated was then laid out in one yard squares. Letters were assigned to the grid lines running east-west, and numbers to those running north-south. Each square was designated by the grid lines intersecting at its northeast corner. To facilitate exact measurement, a series of stakes was set up along the baseline at intervals of two yards. From locations on the stakes on the same horizontal plane as the datum point, lines were extended to corresponding pitons driven into the rear wall of the overhang. A second series of connecting lines formed a suspended grid of two yard squares.
A preliminary test trench one yard wide and four yards long, was dug in squares M6-9 to determine whether complete excavation was warranted. Subsequent yard square test pits were sunk at P 7-8 and K 8. It was hoped that these would indicate the nature of the geologic stratigraphy and at least suggest the range of cultural materials which might be expected. Since excavation seemed warranted, the entire area to be worked was cleared of the surface layer of manure.
As set forth in the description of the site, the recent floor sloped up toward the northwest (Fig. 8). Test excavations indicated that the basal layer was approximately horizontal in a north-south direction, but sloped gently up toward the west. There seemed to be no significant correlation between geologic stratigraphy (see below) and typology in any except the lowest layer, which had not yet been extensively investigated. Because the evidence was as yet so scanty, it was decided to excavate with reference to both the surface and the datum point. Each square was treated as a separate unit and, except where natural levels were apparent, excavation proceeded in four inch levels measured from the surface at the northeast corner. Each level was also correlated with the datum point.
Both typological provenience and the position of the basal layer indicated that the major portion of the deposit had been laid down horizontally. To test this hypothesis a careful watch was kept for fragmentary specimens, in the hope of finding corresponding pieces from separate locations. The relative positions of these would suggest the nature of the surface on which they were deposited. Ten such fragments found comprised five artifacts: three potsherds, one handstone and one fragmentary grinding slab. Though some occurred as much as twelve yards apart, each pair fell within the same vertical level. From this analysis it appeared that the occupation levels were in fact approximately horizontal.
Stepped excavation seemed advisable in view of the unconsolidated nature of the deposit (Fig. 5). Vertical exposures more than two feet high collapsed as soon as the lower portions became thoroughly dry. These conditions made stratigraphic columns or balks impractical in most instances. However, by the use of rip-rapping, it was possible to leave a reference balk one foot wide on the north side of line N 5-11.
All material recovered was sifted through quarter inch mesh screens. Since it was fairly loose and dry, most of the earth was removed with shovels. Trowels, brushes and a flexible baby bottle for blowing were employed when features or artifacts _in situ_ were encountered. The location of the screening dump was determined by test augering of the area between the site and the creek. This dump was separated from the excavation by a catwalk and low earthworks. The latter served the dual purpose of guarding against sliding from the dumps, and keeping out water which often poured over the edge of the overhang in the extremely rainy season of 1957.
Artifacts were sacked and later marked by level and square. Floral remains were similarly treated. Faunal material was rather sparse, and was therefore segregated by twelve inch levels measured from the datum point. All features were recorded and located on the map by means of a transit, and located vertically by measurements from the baseline.
Preliminary Discussion of the Stratigraphy
The LoDaisKa site report, published in 1959 as Proceedings No. 8 of the Denver Museum of Natural History, is a collaborative archaeological study by H. T. Irwin and Cynthia Irwin-Williams, with supplementary reports from specialists in pollen analysis, soil chemistry, geology, and paleobotany. The excerpts reveal a work grounded in stratigraphic excavation and laboratory analysis, not a general survey of regional tribes. The catalog subjects list Pawnee and Ute Indians, but the text itself focuses on artifact typology, radiocarbon dating, and environmental reconstruction—particularly the possibility of a Plains route for maize diffusion.
Stratigraphy and Sampling Methods
The excavation methodology is described in detail, with samples taken at six-inch intervals from designated squares such as J8 and M11. The pollen analyst, Donald R. Whitehead, notes that preservation was poor except in the lowermost levels, preventing the construction of a pollen diagram. He explains that differential degradation may have destroyed many original pollen constituents, so his results are presented as a preliminary investigation rather than a definitive reconstruction. The text includes technical descriptions of sample preparation—boiling in KOH, washing with HCl, treatment with HF, acetolysis, and mounting in silicone oil—indicating a rigorous laboratory process. This level of methodological detail suggests the report is aimed at professional archaeologists and paleoecologists, not a general audience.
Maize and the Plains Hypothesis
A significant portion of the excerpts addresses the question of how dent corn reached the Fremont area. The authors cite authorities such as Nickerson, Carter, and Anderson who doubted a direct route through Anasazi, Hohokam, or Mogollon regions. They propose a possible route via the Plains, noting that Fremont peoples evidently ranged into areas where dent corn was used. However, the text is cautious: evidence was totally lacking because of the absence of perishables in most Plains sites. The Morrison area provides some support, but the authors conclude that the question must remain open until much more evidence is available. This measured tone contrasts with the catalog's assignment of the work to broad ethnic categories.
Supplementary Reports and Interdisciplinary Scope
The report includes contributions from multiple specialists: Walton C. Galinat on plant remains, Charles B. Hunt on geology, G. Edward Lewis on fauna, Robert J. Rodden on soil chemistry, and Donald R. Whitehead on pollen. The acknowledgments list many prominent archaeologists who provided comments, including Jesse D. Jennings, Richard G. Forbis, and Gordon R. Willey. This interdisciplinary approach reflects mid-20th-century archaeological practice, where environmental data were increasingly integrated with artifact analysis. The excerpts do not describe specific artifacts or features of the LoDaisKa site itself; instead, they emphasize the analytical techniques and the collaborative nature of the research. Readers should expect a technical report rather than a narrative of prehistoric life.
Readers approaching this work should be prepared for a dense, data-rich publication that prioritizes methodology over interpretation. The catalog subjects may imply a focus on specific tribes, but the text itself is concerned with stratigraphy, pollen identification, and the diffusion of maize. The supplementary reports are integral to the main argument, not appendices. For those interested in the history of Plains archaeology or the application of pollen analysis to archaeological sites, this report offers a detailed case study from the late 1950s.
In the LoDaisKa report, I always pause over the layers of pollen and stone—how a place holds its people quietly. It reminds me of another volume, Indians of the Yosemite valley and vicinity Their history, customs and traditions — A Reader’s Guide, where every page feels like that same gentle patience, a landscape speaking in its own time.
There are no reviews for this eBook.
Before you leave, reflect on the book
Use these questions to collect your thoughts before moving on.