The Bontoc Igorot — A Reader’s Guide

(0 User reviews)   785
In Category - Social Conditions
Jenks, Albert Ernest, 1869-1953 Project Gutenberg 2005 Not confirmed
Bontoks (Philippine people); Igorot (Philippine people); Ethnology -- Philippines Readers of public-domain and historical texts
Project Gutenberg digital edition en

Edition facts

Words 116,364
Reading time 506 min
Text sections 15

The Bontoc Igorot — A Reader’s Guide can be approached with a clearer sense of reading commitment from its source measurements: 116,364 words, 8 hr 26 min estimated reading time, and 15 detected text sections.

The text analysis averages about 23.6 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.

Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Bontoks (Philippine people),” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.

Albert Ernest Jenks's 1905 ethnography examines the Bontoc Igorot of northern Luzon through precise observations of material culture, social organization, and language. The text balances systematic description with firsthand accounts, revealing the author's attention to regional variation in artifacts, customs, and trade networks.
Share
Editorial Edition Score 4.9/5

Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.

How this score is calculated
  • Description quality20 pts
  • Title & short description10 pts
  • Source metadata20 pts
  • Text length15 pts
  • Chapters / structure15 pts
  • EPUB file integrity20 pts

Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.

Edition quality

Read the Text

Spaniards did little for them except to shoot them. There is yet a long, heavy wooden stock in Bontoc pueblo in which the Igorot were imprisoned. Igorot women were made the mistresses of both officers and soldiers. Work, food, fuel, and lumber were not always paid for. All persons 18 or more years old were required to pay an annual tax of 50 cents or an equivalent value in rice. A day's wage was only 5 cents, so each family was required to pay an equivalent of twenty days' labor annually. In wild towns the principal men were told to bring in so many thousand bunches of palay -- the unthreshed rice. If it was not all brought in, the soldiers frequently went for it, accompanied by Igorot warriors; they gathered up the rice, and sometimes burned the entire pueblo. Apad, the principal man of Tinglayan, was confined six years in Spanish jails at Bontoc and Vigan because he repeatedly failed to compel his people to bring in the amount of palay assessed them.

They say there were three small guardhouses on the outskirts of Bontoc pueblo, and armed Igorot from an outside town were not allowed to enter. They were disarmed, and came and went under guard.

The Spanish comandantes in charge of the province seem to have remained only about two years each. Saldero was the last one. Early in the eighties of the nineteenth century the comandante took his command to Barlig, a day east of Bontoc, to punish that town because it had killed people in Tulubin and Samoki; Barlig all but exterminated the command -- only three men escaped to tell the tale. Mandicota, a Spanish officer, went from Manila with a battalion of 1,000 soldiers to erase Barlig from the map; he was also accompanied from Bontoc by 800 warriors from that vicinity. The Barlig people fled to the mountains, losing only seven men, whose heads the Bontoc Igorot cut off and brought home.

Comandante Villameres is reported to have taken twenty soldiers and about 520 warriors of Bontoc and Samoki to punish Tukukan for killing a Samoki woman; the warriors returned with three heads.

They say that in 1891 Comandante Alfaro took 40 soldiers and 1,000 warriors from the vicinity of Bontoc to Ankiling; sixty heads adorned the triumphant return of the warriors.

In 1893 Nevas is said to have taken 100 soldiers and 500 warriors to Sadanga; they brought back one head.

A few years later Saldero went to "clear up" rebellious Sagada with soldiers and Igorot warriors; Bontoc reports that the warriors returned with 100 heads.

The insurrectos appeared before Cervantes two or three months after Saldero's bloody work in Sagada. The Spanish garrison fled before the insurrectos; the Spanish civilians went with them, taking their flocks and herds to Bontoc. A thousand pesos was the price offered by the Igorot of Sagada to the insurrectos for Saldero's head when the Philippine soldiers passed through the pueblo; but Saldero made good his escape from Bontoc, and left the country by boat from Vigan.

The Bontoc Igorot assisted the insurrectos in many ways when they first came. About 2 miles west of Bontoc is a Spanish rifle pit, and there the Spanish soldiers, now swelled to about 600 men, lay in wait for the insurrectos. There on two hilltops an historic sham battle occurred. The two forces were nearly a mile apart, and at that distance they exchanged rifle bullets three days. The Spaniards finally surrendered, on condition of safe escort to the coast. For fifty years they had conquered their enemy who were armed only with spear and ax; but the insurrectos were armed with guns. However, the really hard pressing came from the rear -- there were still the ax and spear -- and few soldiers from cuartel or trench who tried to bring food or water for the fighting men ever reported why they were delayed.

Albert Ernest Jenks's The Bontoc Igorot opens with a letter of transmittal dated February 3, 1904, framing the work as a scientific study for the Ethnological Survey of the Philippine Islands. The author's voice is that of a systematic observer, cataloguing everything from pipe manufacture to head-hunting rituals. One early detail—the description of the balbelasan battle-ax—shows Jenks's method: he notes its distribution, the pueblos that make it but do not use it, and the precise boundary where it gives way to the bolo. This attention to regional variation recurs throughout, as when he records that the clay pipe emerges in three colors depending on firing time: gray after nine hours, red after twelve, and black after reburning in palay straw.

The Ethnographer's Gaze: Precision in Material Description

Jenks's prose is most vivid when he describes objects. The balbelasan ax, he writes, has a blade that 'suggests along the edge the striking form of the beak of a rapacious bird,' with a handle 'fitted with a long iron ferrule' and decorated with 'bands of brass or tin.' He does not merely list features; he traces the weapon's geography: used east and northeast of Bontoc pueblo, it is absent in Ambawan, which uses the Sapao bolo exclusively. The bolo itself is 'a broad blade swelling markedly toward the center,' sheathed in an open scabbard in Quiangan but in a closed wooden one within Bontoc area. Such details reveal a network of local manufacture and trade, where a single pueblo may import its weapon from a neighboring group. Jenks's descriptions are never generic; they are anchored to specific places, materials, and techniques.

Voice and the Limits of Observation

Jenks frequently signals what he does not know. He writes, 'I never learned that wooden pipes are made by them for commercial purposes,' and 'I was told by the Kalinga…' that the ax reaches the Cagayan region. These admissions of ignorance are not weaknesses; they define the boundaries of his fieldwork. His account of pipe production is similarly cautious: he names three woods—ga-sa′-tan, la-no′-ti, and gi-gat′—but does not claim to know their botanical identities. When describing the clay pipe's manufacture, he notes that the clay is 'carefully macerated between the fingers' and shaped with 'a set of five light, wooden tools,' but he does not speculate on ritual meanings. This restraint gives the text a documentary quality, letting the reader see both the richness of the data and the gaps in the record.

Structure as Argument: The Table of Contents

The book's organization is itself a statement. Jenks divides his study into sections on social life, economic life, political life, aesthetic life, religion, and mental life—a framework that imposes Western scientific categories on Igorot culture. Yet within these headings, the content resists neat classification. The section 'Economic Life' includes 'Theft' and 'Conquest' alongside 'Production' and 'Distribution.' 'Aesthetic Life' covers dress, tattoo, music, and games, but also 'Formalities' and 'Religion.' The table of contents reveals a tension between the desire for systematic order and the messy reality of lived culture. Jenks's decision to place 'War and Head-Hunting' under 'Political Life and Control' rather than 'Religion' suggests a particular analytical choice—one that prioritizes social structure over cosmology.

Language and the Ethnographic Record

Jenks includes a Bontoc vocabulary and notes on linguistic inconsistencies, showing an awareness that language is part of the ethnographic evidence. He records native terms for objects—ki-na-lo′-sab for the clay pipe, anito for the metal pipe—and uses them consistently. This practice embeds the reader in the local lexicon. The vocabulary list, placed near the end, functions as a key to the preceding chapters. Jenks also observes that the Igorot manufacturer of the bolo 'does not make the scabbard,' a detail that hints at specialization and trade. His linguistic notes are brief but suggestive: he notes that 'the Igorot of Bontoc area make pipes of wood, clay, and metal,' but the word for each type may differ. The text thus becomes a record not only of things but of the words used to name them.

Jenks's The Bontoc Igorot rewards readers who attend to its details. The author's voice is that of a fieldworker who trusts his eyes and his informants, but who also knows when to stop. The book is not a seamless narrative; it is a collection of observations, some exhaustive, some fragmentary. To read it is to watch an ethnographer at work, noting the color of a pipe after twelve hours of firing, the shape of a blade, the boundary where one weapon gives way to another. The gaps are as instructive as the data.

There are moments in Jenks’s account—a basket’s weave, a trade route’s bend—where the sheer patience of his looking feels almost like a quiet friendship. I found that same unhurried fondness in Indian Games : an historical research — A Closer Reading, where games are handled with similar care, not as spectacle, but as remembered practices. It left me thinking how much reverence lives in simply paying attention.

There are no reviews for this eBook.

0
0 out of 5 (0 User reviews )

Add a Review

Your Rating *
There are no comments for this eBook.

Reader reflection

What did you think of this book?

Answer a few questions and save a private reflection on this device.

Your progress 0 / 10
1

What is your current status with this title?

2

How much did you enjoy the reading experience?

3

Is this a title you would suggest to others?

4

What was the reading difficulty like?

Related eBooks