The Coal Measures Amphibia of North America — A Reader’s Guide
Edition facts
Before opening The Coal Measures Amphibia of North America — A Reader’s Guide, the edition data offers a quick orientation: 113,485 words, 8 hr 14 min estimated reading time, and 22 detected text sections.
The text analysis averages about 12.9 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.
Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Amphibians, Fossil -- North America,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.
Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.
How this score is calculated
- Description quality20 pts
- Title & short description10 pts
- Source metadata20 pts
- Text length15 pts
- Chapters / structure15 pts
- EPUB file integrity20 pts
Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.
Read the Text
LEM OF THE AMPHIBIA FROM THE COAL MEASURES.
The Amphibia from the Coal Measures of North America present the problem of the origin of the land vertebrates, since the air-breathing vertebrates in the Coal Measures of this continent are the earliest known in the western hemisphere. The difference in age between the chief amphibian-bearing deposits of North America and Europe is not great, although it has been asserted that _Pholidogaster_ and its allied fauna, described by Huxley from Scotland (331), is much older, probably Mississippian. It is interesting to note that these earliest representatives of the Amphibia in Scotland are all temnospondyles, of which there are very few representatives in the Coal Measures of North America.
The forms so far described from the North American Coal Measures present a very high degree of development and differentiation, the earliest known species being already specialized and well adapted for various modes of life. As far back in geological time as the middle Coal Measures, when the first well-defined forms are known, environmental conditions had effected a wide diversity of structure within the group. Thus, early in the geological history of the land vertebrates, we have, among the Coal Measures Amphibia, various forms which had specialized into strictly aquatic, terrestrial, subterrestrial, and arboreal, or at least partly arboreal. Specialization had extended to the loss of limbs, ribs, and ventral armature in a few species, and to the acquirement of claws, running legs, or a long propelling tail with expanded neural and hæmal arches in others. The forms range in size from small creatures less than an inch in length to large species which must have attained a length of several feet. A rather interesting parallel, though of no phylogenetic significance, can be drawn between the Amphibia of the North American Coal Measures and the reptiles of to-day. The snakes are represented by the limbless, snake-like forms, such as _Ptyonius_ and _Phlegethontia_. The lizards find their counterpart in the Hylonomidæ and the Tuditanidæ. No known characters of these animals tend to ally them directly with any known group of fishes, except in the most general way. These facts all indicate a long antecedent history for the amphibian group or else a preceding period of greatly accelerated development of which we now know nothing.
The Amphibia whose remains have been brought to light from the Coal Measures have hitherto been regarded as pertaining to a single order, the Stegocephalia, characterized by the completely roofed-over cranium and a large parasphenoid. The writer (469) had previously assigned 5 suborders to the group: the Branchiosauria, Microsauria, Aistopoda, Temnospondylia, and Stereospondylia. All of these groups are represented in the Coal Measures of North America. It has seemed inadvisable, in the light of our present knowledge of the Amphibia, to retain these 5 groups as suborders, and, in the revised scheme of classification which has been published elsewhere (469), they are given the rank of orders all excepting the Aistopoda, which are now regarded by the writer as specialized Microsauria.
The recent Caudata are possibly represented in the North American Coal Measures by forms which may be assigned tentatively to the Proteida. Such forms as _Cocytinus gyrinoides_, _Hyphasma lævis_, and _Erierpeton branchialis_ possibly represent this group in the Pennsylvanian. This relationship is based chiefly on the structure of the hyobranchial apparatus and on the general structure of the species. The three above-mentioned species are, however, very insufficiently known, and the relationship can hardly be regarded as more than suggested by the characters which are at hand.
The Salientia, or frogs, may possibly have their ancestral type in _Pelion lyelli_, the first known species from the Linton, Ohio, Coal Measures. Oddly enough, among the hundreds of specimens collected later from this horizon, not a fragment can be identified with this species. The type specimen is unique, and although incomplete its characters are suggestive.
Roy Lee Moodie's 1916 monograph opens not with a fossil but with a plea for interdisciplinary cooperation. In the prefatory note, E. C. Case argues that stratigraphy cannot be interpreted without biological laws, nor can earth formations be rearranged to explain life's distribution without geological knowledge. This framing sets the work apart from a mere catalog of bones: it is an explicit effort to bridge paleontology and geology, a theme that recurs in Moodie's own preface, where he notes the origin of land vertebrates has 'appealed to many investigators.' The text thus positions itself within a broader scientific conversation, one that values synthesis over isolated description.
Anatomical Disputes and Descriptive Precision
Moodie's descriptions are punctuated by direct disagreements with earlier researchers, especially Jaekel. In the excerpt on Diceratosaurus lævis, Moodie states plainly: 'I do not find the remarkable elements which Jaekel has figured.' He challenges Jaekel's 'perisquamosal' and the fusion of skull elements, arguing that grooves and ridges indicate a separation between supratemporal and squamosal bones. The tone is measured but firm, relying on the evidence of the type specimen rather than authority. Moodie also corrects Cope, identifying a bone Cope thought resembled a 'lacertilian pubis' as the left scapula. These moments reveal a scientist working with limited material—often a single specimen—yet willing to revise established interpretations.
The Vocabulary of Fossil Bone
Moodie's language is technical but not opaque. He describes the humerus of Diceratosaurus robustus as 'a very stout bone' that 'at once recalls that of Amblyrhynchus,' a modern marine iguana. Such comparisons ground the extinct in the familiar. He notes that the ribs are 'not long, are rather stout, and beyond the proximal curve are nearly straight to the obtuse tips.' The precision extends to the ventral scutellation, where scales are 'oat-shaped and take the usual form.' These phrases accumulate into a vivid picture of the animal's build, even as Moodie acknowledges uncertainty—the rib heads are 'so obscure that it is impossible to determine whether they were two-headed or not.'
Pacing and the Structure of Evidence
The monograph's rhythm alternates between dense anatomical passages and broader interpretive statements. After several pages of bone-by-bone analysis, Moodie steps back to consider the pectoral girdle as a whole, concluding that 'the clavicles in this species have a tendency to assume the triangular shape so common in other species of Microsauria.' Such generalizations are rare and therefore striking. The text also includes reconstructions—line drawings of skull outlines—that visually summarize the descriptive work. These figures, like the one labeled 'Fig. 24,' serve as resting points in an otherwise relentless march of technical detail. Moodie's prose is most dynamic when he is arguing with a predecessor; elsewhere, it settles into a steady, methodical catalog.
Readers approaching this monograph should be prepared for a work that demands patience with anatomical terminology but rewards attention to its argumentative undercurrents. Moodie's disagreements with Jaekel and Cope are not footnotes; they are the engine of the text. The prefatory call for interdisciplinary work may feel aspirational rather than realized, but it gives the book a coherence that a simple species list would lack. For those interested in the history of paleontology, this is a document of how fossil amphibians were understood—and contested—in the early twentieth century.
That rainy afternoon, Moodie’s descriptions of ancient amphibians felt less like dry taxonomy and more like a quiet meditation on time—how bones endure while landscapes shift. My mind wandered to other remnants buried near Denver, those same deep layers holding different stories. I found myself drifting into Excavations at the LoDaisKa Site in the Denver, Colorado area — Background and Themes, and the same unhurried patience returned, only this time among stone tools and hearths.
There are no reviews for this eBook.
Before you leave, reflect on the book
Use these questions to collect your thoughts before moving on.