Hawkins-Davison Houses, Frederica, St. Simons Island, Georgia — Inside the Classic
Edition facts
For Hawkins-Davison Houses, Frederica, St. Simons Island, Georgia — Inside the Classic, the stored edition analysis reports 13,267 words, 58 min estimated reading time, and 2 detected text sections.
The text analysis averages about 19.0 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.
Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Dwellings -- Georgia -- Saint Simons Island,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.
Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.
How this score is calculated
- Description quality20 pts
- Title & short description10 pts
- Source metadata20 pts
- Text length15 pts
- Chapters / structure15 pts
- EPUB file integrity20 pts
Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.
Read the Text
ut the lay-out of Frederica. Twenty-five years ago the only published map which gave information about the pattern of the town was that which forms the frontispiece for the chapter on “Frederica” in _Dead Towns of Georgia_ by Charles C. Jones, Jr.[2] Though this map gave the plan of the old town, it was too small to be of any value.
The only maps available which gave any detailed information about the fort and the town were those made in 1796 by Joshua Miller, Deputy Surveyor of Glynn County, Georgia. These were made by order of the General Assembly of Georgia, which named Commissioners for the Town of Frederica, directing them to have a resurvey made to lay out the town “as nearly as possible to the original plan thereof....”[3] One was a detailed map of the Town of Frederica, showing the lay-out of the town, with the streets, wards and lots, together with the number of each lot. Then, for the first time was it possible to locate the exact lot on which any particular settler had lived.[4]
In 1952 original manuscript maps of Fort Frederica and the Town of Frederica, dated 1736, were found in the John Carter Brown Library, Brown University, Providence, R. I. The legend states that these maps were made “by a Swiss engineer,” whom the author has identified as Samuel Augspourger, a native of Switzerland, who was surveyor at Frederica in 1736.[5] The Augspourger map of Fort Frederica is most valuable, giving information about the fort, parapets, palisades, moat, and other details which had hitherto been unknown. However, Augspourger’s map of the Town of Frederica gave no information as to the lot numbers, names of streets, and other details which were desired.
Information about the Frederica settlers and their way of life has been buried in old letters and other records. Only by careful reading of available material in the scores of published and unpublished volumes of the colonial records of Georgia could small bits of such information be found and pieced together to give the picture of early days at Frederica. It is known that records were kept of the lot owners, for Oglethorpe wrote the Trustees in 1738, “I send you a Plan of ye Town of Frederica with the Granted Lotts & the names of the Possessors”[6] but this list has not yet been located among Georgia’s early records.
Even though these volumes of the colonial records contained the names of many of the settlers and told of the part they played in the life of Frederica, rarely did they contain information as to the number of the lot which such individuals occupied. Not until 1947 when the University of Georgia purchased a manuscript collection of Georgiana, known as the Egmont Papers of the Phillipps Collection, did this definite information become available. From material in this collection Dr. E. Merton Coulter and Dr. Albert B. Saye edited in 1949 _A List of the Early Settlers of Georgia_, which gives the lot numbers granted these settlers and makes it possible to locate each individual on the proper lot.
It is believed that this list was compiled in England by Viscount Percival, Earl of Egmont, President of the Board of Trustees for the Founding of the Colony of Georgia, from information sent over from Georgia from time to time. As is so often the case with such records, there were errors. One such instance is the listing of lot number 2, South Ward, Frederica, for Samuel Davison and the same lot for Dr. Thomas Hawkins. Since the Hawkins and Davison families came to Frederica at the same time and were among the first settlers of Frederica, it is obvious that both of them could not have had lot number 2, South Ward.
Davison left Georgia in 1741,[7] moving to Charleston, S. C., and Dr. Hawkins returned to England in 1743.[8] In 1767 George Mackintosh petitioned for lot number 1, South Ward of Frederica “formerly belonging to Dr. Hawkins.”[9] His petition was not granted. In January of the following year Christian Perkins,[10] widow, petitioned the Colonial Council, stating that “there was a Lot in Frederica known by the Name of Dr. Hawkins’s which was left in the Care and Possession of the Petitioner’s late Husband by John Hawkins the said Doctor’s Brother who was supposed to be entitled thereto That her said Husband from the Time the said Lot was so left with him to the Time of his Death (being many Years) had the Possession thereof and constantly accounted for the Taxes and other Provincial Duties,” and asked that it be granted to her.[11] This was done, the lot being recorded as number 1, South Ward.[12] Thus, in this 1768 record we have proof that lot number 1, South Ward belonged to Dr. Hawkins, leaving Samuel Davison in undisputed possession of lot number 2.
The catalog subjects for this work—dwellings, Fort Frederica National Monument, and St. Simons Island history—suggest a broad architectural or local-history study. However, the text itself is a tightly focused archaeological report, originally published in The Georgia Historical Quarterly in 1956. It describes the excavation of two adjacent house sites in the abandoned town of Frederica, blending measured floor plans, stratigraphic observations, and documentary evidence. The authors, Margaret Davis Cate and Charles H. Fairbanks, do not offer a general history of the island or the fort; instead, they reconstruct the Hawkins and Davison houses from postholes, brick fragments, and colonial deeds.
Excavation as Primary Evidence
The text’s core is a detailed account of digging. The authors describe finding “bottomless barrels” used as well linings, a “tabby floor” later covered by a “brick floor, set with tabby mortar in a herringbone pattern,” and a “double wall” that made the Davison house “drier and warmer” than its neighbor. These physical details are not decorative; they are the primary evidence for the houses’ construction and use. The catalog subject “Dwellings” is accurate, but the work does not survey domestic architecture generally. It treats each foundation, hearth, and trash pit as a document to be read alongside written records.
The Fort as Context, Not Subject
Fort Frederica appears in the opening paragraphs as the reason the town existed, but the excavation focuses on the town’s residential lots, not the fortification itself. The authors note that the town was “half a hexagon in shape, divided by Talbott Street” into two wards, and that it was “surrounded by a moat” with a “wall of posts ten feet high.” Yet the catalog subject “Fort Frederica National Monument” might mislead a reader expecting a military history. The fort is backdrop; the houses are the stage. The text’s value lies in showing how domestic life was embedded in a fortified settlement, not in describing the fort’s structure or battles.
Documentary Archaeology in Practice
Cate and Fairbanks constantly cross-reference physical finds with written sources. They cite a remark attributed to Dr. Hawkins that he would sell the Davison children “one to the Carpenter and the other to the Plasterer,” using it to explain the Davison house’s superior insulation. They also mention a “hedge of pomegranates” recorded for Hawkins’s lot and identify a “line of root disturbances” that may mark its location. This interplay between artifact and archive is the work’s real subject, not captured by any single catalog term. The text demonstrates how archaeology can test and amplify historical records, offering a model for studying other “dead towns.”
Readers should approach this work as a technical report, not a narrative history. The authors assume familiarity with colonial Georgia and archaeological methods. Pay attention to the footnotes (indicated by bracketed numbers) and the way each measurement or artifact is tied to a specific lot or document. The text rewards careful reading: a musket bayonet in a well, a stairwell’s extra width, or a fireplace’s altered pilasters all become clues to how two families lived—and quarreled—in a frontier town.
Years among these brittle pages taught me that a house is never just timber and plaster, but a record of daily labors. The Hawkins-Davison homes whisper of hands that swept and sewed. This same quiet persistence lives in the essays of a certain book, where humble acts become their own archaeology. One volume speaks of foundations; the other, remarkably, of the lives that hold them up. Women's Work — Key Ideas to Explore feels like a kindred spirit, shelved closer than one might think.
There are no reviews for this eBook.
Before you leave, reflect on the book
Use these questions to collect your thoughts before moving on.